TL;DR
Get workout gear delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
In a six-month trial involving 123 healthy adults with an average age of 72, high-intensity interval training reduced fat while preserving measured lean mass. Moderate exercise also reduced fat but was accompanied by a small decline in lean mass; researchers cautioned that the differences were modest and may not be clinically meaningful.
A six-month study of 123 healthy older adults found that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) reduced fat mass without the small decline in measured lean mass seen with moderate-intensity exercise. The University of the Sunshine Coast research, published in Maturitas, found differences in body composition among the exercise groups. Researchers said the changes were modest and not clearly clinically meaningful compared with lower-intensity exercise.
Participants from the Greater Brisbane region had an average age of 72 and completed three supervised, 45-minute gym sessions each week for six months. They were assigned to high-intensity interval training, moderate-intensity exercise or a low-intensity comparison group. Researchers assessed body composition at the start, three months and six months using a scanning technique that estimates fat and lean tissue.
Both the HIIT and moderate-intensity groups significantly reduced fat mass, with larger reductions than those in the low-intensity group. The distinction was in lean tissue: participants doing moderate exercise had a small decline, while those in the HIIT group reduced fat without the same decline. Lead author and exercise physiologist Dr. Grace Rose said all three groups had modest fat loss, but only HIIT retained lean muscle.
The study also reported improvements in visceral adipose tissue—fat stored deep in the abdomen—in both the high- and moderate-intensity groups. That finding concerns body composition, not a direct measure of health outcomes. The researchers did not establish that the exercise changes prevented disease or improved participants’ strength or daily functioning.
Why Preserving Lean Tissue Matters
For older adults, a reduction in body weight does not automatically mean a more favorable change in body composition. Lean tissue includes muscle, but also other tissues and water; retaining it may matter as people age, when muscle mass and strength can decline. Muscle supports tasks such as climbing stairs, standing from a chair and carrying objects, though this trial did not directly test whether participants became stronger or more independent.
The findings compare changes in body composition across exercise groups, not the number on a scale alone. A similar amount of weight loss can involve different proportions of fat and lean tissue. The study’s modest changes and uncertainty about their clinical importance mean it does not show that HIIT is necessary or the best option for every older person.
Visceral fat is also relevant because higher levels have been associated with metabolic and cardiovascular problems. The trial measured changes in this fat depot; it did not show that the observed reductions changed participants’ disease risk. The study’s body-composition results do not establish health benefits that were not directly tested.
Products Worth Considering
BowFlex Results Series SelectTech Adjustable Dumbbells (Pair)
Bowflex SelectTech 840 Adjustable Kettlebell
Oral-B iO5 Rechargeable Electric Toothbrush with 5 Cleaning Modes
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
How the Six-Month Trial Worked
The researchers compared three exercise intensities under supervised gym conditions. HIIT alternated short, hard efforts with easier recovery periods, while the other groups trained at moderate or low intensity. Associate Professor of Physiology and co-author Mia Schaumberg described the hard intervals as periods when breathing was heavy and conversation difficult.
The study’s comparison is about body composition over six months, not a head-to-head test of every workout format or a long-term follow-up. Participants were healthy older adults, averaging a body mass index of about 26 kilograms per square metre. The results may not apply in the same way to people with health conditions, lower fitness, or different exercise access.
Body composition was estimated with scanning, but the researchers did not directly measure muscle strength in the reported findings. Lean mass is not identical to muscle, and changes in a scan cannot be assumed to produce equivalent changes in strength or function. The researchers also cautioned that the differences were not clearly clinically meaningful after measurement uncertainty was considered.
“We found that high, medium and low intensity exercises all led to modest fat loss but only HIIT retained lean muscle.”
— Dr. Grace Rose, lead author and exercise physiologist at the University of the Sunshine Coast
Limits of the Body-Composition Findings
The report describes the differences as relatively small and says they were not clearly clinically meaningful compared with lower-intensity exercise, particularly after measurement uncertainty was taken into account. It does not provide a basis for treating the findings as proof that HIIT produces a substantial or lasting advantage for all older adults.
It is also unclear from the reported findings whether the changes persisted after the six-month program ended. The scans estimated lean tissue rather than muscle strength, and the study did not establish whether the participants’ ability to perform everyday tasks changed. The reported visceral-fat results likewise do not establish a reduction in disease risk.
The trial involved healthy participants and supervised sessions, so its results may not translate directly to people with chronic conditions, mobility limitations or no access to supervised training. HIIT can be demanding. Older adults considering a strenuous program should seek advice from a qualified health professional, especially if they have existing medical conditions or are returning to exercise.
Questions for Future Exercise Research
The findings point to a need for further research on whether the body-composition differences are clinically meaningful and whether they last beyond a structured six-month program. Longer follow-up could assess whether participants maintain the changes and whether lean-mass measurements correspond to differences in strength, mobility or everyday function.
The available report does not identify a further trial or a scheduled next milestone. For now, the study supports a limited conclusion: in this group of healthy older adults, supervised HIIT reduced fat without the small decline in measured lean tissue observed with moderate exercise. It does not establish that all older adults should adopt HIIT or that other forms of exercise cannot support health.
Key Questions
What did the study find about HIIT and fat loss?
In the six-month trial, the HIIT group reduced fat mass without the same small decline in measured lean tissue reported in the moderate-intensity group. Fat loss was modest, and the researchers cautioned that the differences may not be clinically meaningful.
How many people took part?
The trial included 123 healthy older adults from the Greater Brisbane region. Their average age was 72.
Did the study show that HIIT improved strength?
No. Researchers measured body composition, including estimates of fat and lean tissue, rather than directly measuring muscle strength or everyday function.
Should every older adult start HIIT?
The study does not establish that HIIT is appropriate for everyone. It involved healthy adults exercising under supervision, and the intervals were demanding. People with health conditions or concerns should discuss strenuous exercise with a qualified health professional before starting.
Source: rss
